Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Why I think What Sarah Sahagian Thinks of Movember is Irrelevant and Ridiculous


I read the article Why I think Movember is offensive by Sarah Sahagian expecting to be amused by a whimsical account of how a woman felt excluded by her lack of facial hair while being subjected to repeated viewings of cheesy mustachioed men conjuring images of 70's porn films.  Instead I was treated to a ridiculous, poorly thought out mental spasm by a woman who apparently has a problem with anyone who is white, male and Christian.

Apparently being white male and Christian excludes you from trying to do anything progressive.  White male Christians got it too easy from the beginning, now they should stand aside and let the less privileged focus on anything that might benefit anyone in the world. 

The thrust of her argument is that Movember excludes other cultures who might not be able to easily grow facial hair, people with religious beliefs that prohibit hair cutting such as Sikhs, and of course women.

She links Movember, a fundraising and educational campaign about men's cancers - in particular prostate and testicular cancer - to prejudice, racisim and racial profiling.  This is a leap beyond the range of an atomic powered kangaroo and in doing so she does little more than reveal her own prejudice against white men and Christians while demonstrating a staggering lack of concern for the problems Movember seeks to illuminate through humor.

"What of men who have a hard time growing any facial hair at all?" She asks, and then goes on to talk about how "...women with facial hair are routinely subjected to harrassment, violence and cyber bullying."

While it is true that women with facial hair are subject to all kinds of nasty abusive behavior, that has nothing at all to do with the Movember campaign.  This is simply a fallacious argument.

Men who can't grow facial hair are not prohibited from seeing others around them grow mustaches, and if they're offended by people who are able to grow mustaches it really says more about them than anyone else.  Regardless they can still benefit from the education provided by the campaign.

"Next," She says, "Movember is actually really racist." and goes on to point out how Sikhs and certain Muslims would be restricted from shaving their mustache at the start of the month by their religion.  Again, a fallacy.

That argument makes as much sense as saying that holding a community pig roast is racist because Muslims and Jews wouldn't eat it.  Ridiculous!  Granted not everyone can eat the pork, but that doesn’t mean it’s the only thing served.  There can certainly be other things on the menu to include everyone.

What Sarah fails to recognize is the other things on the menu with the  Movember campaign such as the programs stated goals.


Living with and Beyond Cancer

Staying Mentally Healthy, Living with and Beyond Mental Illness

Men's Health Research.

Movember is about starting a conversation about men's health.  Men all too often believe themselves to be indestructible and don't go to doctors as often as they should.  One of the great results of the Movember campaign is that of the men who participate, 85% of them will have a conversation about their health when normally they wouldn't have that conversation at all.  It is a simple, fun campaign.

To say that a campaign is offensive because not everyone can participate in one aspect of it - in this case growing a cheesy mustache - is ridiculous in the extreme.  Men of all races, colors and creeds benefit from the simple conversations it starts and the awareness it brings whether they are a smooth faced Asian or a scruffy Norwegian Viking.

Sarah should spend less time trying to be offended and spend more time spreading the word.  The Movember campaign helps all men, not just white Christian ones.